Skip to content
Better Finder Holland

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Define President Trump's Political Legacy - as well as America's Role in the World

In the wake of launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building arena.

In a notable news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a delegation comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the embattled nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" actually means is ambiguous, but the commitment signifies an abrupt change of course for the president, full of inconsistencies and daunting challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who sharply criticised past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America first" international policy is now gambling his administration on successfully reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose governmental stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly upbeat.

He said his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He vowed to enlist American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, supplying capital for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of sending American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has altered Venezuela's prospects – whether for good or ill.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has shown that he is more than willing to use armed force worldwide.

In the past week, he ordered airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to past actions, which have largely involved missiles and aircraft that minimize the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the fate of that nation – are markedly distinct.

His aim, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Domestic and International Reaction

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - slogan could be difficult for some of Trump's followers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was quick to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual military aggression and support of foreign wars is understandable because we are compelled to pay for it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and warranted".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard trade, land and resources that are core to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will raise broader questions in international relations, however, and affect American relations with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a reckless attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered comparable condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main concern is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic opponents were blunter.

"America should not be managing other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's choice not to consult with legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to follow the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a triumph – with no American deaths and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical bravado, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most stunning, successful and powerful displays of American power and competency in American history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that success enduring, as the US claims it will take over administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails is unknown. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a hemisphere that is bound to be wary of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

By

Claudia Boyer

Emma is a travel enthusiast and writer, exploring the hidden gems of the Netherlands.

Better Finder Holland

Type to search articles.